My readings this week brought me across this article from the New York Times. The article describes a study done by Yale researchers on whether or not monkeys could be taught how to use money. They gave each monkey a set number of tokens they could use to exchange for food and then watched what the monkeys did. Immediately, the monkeys began expressing preferences for certain types of food. Some preferred Jello while others liked fruit. This got the researchers thinking; what if the things they liked were more expensive? So that’s what they did. After changing the price of the offerings to make preferred items more expensive, the monkeys changed their buying habits in a manner consistent with what is called optimization(here’s another description). Basically, the monkeys bought less of their preferred foods and more of their second and third choices.
This is why as a personal trainer I structure my nutrition coaching this way when my clients are looking to take ownership of their weight. Flexible dieting gives them the ability to choose if they would rather have 5 apples, 2 chicken breasts, or one order of fries without sacrificing the greater goal of weight loss. It allows them to optimize much like the monkeys did with the tokens and like they already do with their finances. Simply by getting people to see the economic side of nutrition, they begin to understand things better. By introducing concepts of cost, they can spend their calories more wisely.
Everyone’s biggest gripe with the fitness industry is the sheer amount of (mis)information out there. It’s impossible to find what you’re looking for, especially when you don’t know if what you’re reading is actually true. I’ve got seven myths here that have been circulated for long enough. It’s time to change that.
This list came from this article where a team of researchers found several myths that have been circulating for a while. For the research backing up my points, check it out.
Yes, small changes produce results but it’s going to take more than cutting the cream from your coffee to lose that extra 15lbs you’ve been carrying since college. You’re body is pretty good about keeping things stable and one or two little changes won’t disturb it enough to cause lasting change.
Instead: Try for constant small steps in a healthier direction. Those little steps eventually add up to bigger lifestyle shifts. How about starting by swapping the fries for a salad at lunch? Then how about dropping the large Coke for a medium and eventually replacing it with water? Step by step we’ve eliminated ~800 calories from you regular lunch. If you were eating that 5x per week, that’s a massive 4000 calories less!
Myth #2 – Setting realistic goals is important
Goals drive change, but it turns out that it doesn’t matter how reasonable they are. All that matters is that you want to move in the right direction.
Instead: Don’t get caught up with specifics. Chase something ambitious and don’t let go. Whether that’s doing your first pull up, deadlifting 2x your body weight, or being able to run a 5k, just get out and work for it. The results will come.
It doesn’t matter if you lose it fast or slow, weight loss is weight loss. There will always be a chance of gaining the weight back if you slack off but losing it fast doesn’t increase that risk.
Instead: Match your diet to your motivation. When you’ve got the energy to be aggressive then shoot for shedding those pounds ASAP. Slammed at work and need to focus your energy there? Dial things back a bit and take the slow and steady approach.
Myth #4 – You need to be very ready to diet
You either want it or you don’t. There is no middle ground here. It’s either a priority or it isn’t. It doesn’t matter if you want it a lot or a little, you’ll see progress here.
Instead: Check out this articleon procrastination and get started. Don’t wait for inspiration to strike or the moons to align. You are in control here.
There have been several studies that show increased time in gym class doesn’t change childhood obesity rates at all.
Instead: Don’t rely on schools to teach your kids how to be healthy, show them how yourself. This is an awesome articleby Lance Goyke on how to inspire your children to live healthier.
Myth #6 – Breast feeding prevents obesity later in life
There were some studies published that claimed this to be true, but these publications have been discredited. Other, better studies have been done proving there is no correlation. Breast feeding has been show to have a host of benefits, but keeping your child thin isn’t one of them.
Instead: Help establish healthy habits as soon as you can. You child’s foundational years set the stage for the person they will become. Promote healthy eating and physical activity will do wonders for their health later in life.
Myth #7 – Sex burns as many calories as exercise
I’m just going to copy the researcher’s writing on this one because a summary won’t do it justice.
The energy expenditure of sexual intercourse can be estimated … For example, a man weighing 154 lb (70 kg) would, at 3 METs, expend approximately 3.5 kcal per minute (210 kcal per hour) during a stimulation and orgasm session. This level of expenditure is similar to that achieved by walking at a moderate pace (approximately 2.5 miles [4 km] per hour).
Given that the average bout of sexual activity lasts about 6 minutes,19 a man in his early-to-mid-30s might expend approximately 21 kcal during sexual intercourse. Of course, he would have spent roughly one third that amount of energy just watching television, so the incremental benefit of one bout of sexual activity with respect to energy expended is plausibly on the order of 14 kcal.
Instead: If you’re using this line, you already know you’re just making things up. How about you just say what you want instead?
Hope you guys enjoyed the read and learned a thing or two! Stay tuned for more soon!
The premise behind a vegan diet is a simple one, no animal products at all. One step past vegetarianism, vegans avoid animal derived foods such as eggs and milk in addition to meats. The vegan movement started in the mid 1940’s but began to explode in popularity in recent years as it has gained mainstream attention and celebrity endorsement. Originally promoted from a moral perspective against animal cruelty, the vegan diet has drawn the attention of nutritionists and researchers. Vegan diets are entirely plant focused with the majority of protein coming from soy derived foods such as tofu, tempeh, or textured vegetable protein (TVP).
The Research
There’s a ton of research out there exploring everything from potential vitamin deficiencies to weight loss to cardiovascular health. Starting with some of the good things: veganism has been shown to help people lose weight quicker than traditional diet plans (Turner-McGrievy et. al. 2007) and there is a 15% reduction in cancer rates in vegan populations (Dinu et. al. 2016).
One of the most comprehensive write ups on the vegan diet comes from the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. In this article, the author talks about the positive health effects the vegan diet has on reducing rates of heart disease, obesity, diabetes, and cancer. These benefits to come with a cost though. Vegans consistently show deficiencies in calcium, zinc, polyunsaturated fats, Vitamin D, and Vitamin B12. All of these nutrients are essential and may develop into larger problems if the deficiency isn’t addressed. Low calcium and Vitamin D may develop into osteoporosis. Polyunsaturated fats are essential in maintaining heart health as well as brain and eye function. Vitamin B12 deficiency has been linked with a host of psychiatric conditions such as dementia and loss of motor control.
The Verdict
The health benefits associated with a vegan diet almost seem too good to be true. That is assuming you address the deficiencies that are common with the diet. Fortifying a vegan diet with supplements including Vitamin B12, Calcium, and Polyunsaturated fats while getting a decent amount of sunlight (for Vitamin D) would negate nearly all of the health concerns. It is worth reading the AJCM article for a more in depth analysis, here is the link again.
In my experience as a personal trainer, getting people to consider a vegetarian or vegan diet is challenging. Despite knowing the health benefits, I have trouble myself saying no to meat and animal products. Growing up on the American Standard Diet, meat and dairy for dinner is a difficult trend to break from. But at the end of the day, the numbers don’t lie, a vegan diet may help you live longer and lose weight faster. In my nutrition research this far, veganism is in a league of its own when it comes to reducing the chances of health concerns later in life which is worth some serious consideration.
When it comes to commercial diet plans, Weight Watchers is one of the most well known names in the field. The Weight Watchers method can be loosely described as reducing calories, increasing exercise, and reaching out for social support. These concepts are taught in a way that encourages long term habit building. Weight Watchers us a point system to track food intake. The formula for the point system is basically calories divided by 33 with extra points for carb and fat heavy foods and less points for protein heavy foods. Here’s the equation:
In this equation, calories from sugar and saturated fats count twice while calories from protein have a negative impact. To my knowledge, the divide by 33 is there only to bring things to single digits to make for easy point tracking. Under the point system, many fruits and veggies are automatically given 0 points.
Aside from the point system, the second major part of Weight Watchers are the support meetings. Participants meet on a regular basis to talk about their struggles and successes and learn new tools to help in their weight loss journey.
The Research
With the commercialization of weight loss, there has been a lot of research on which programs are the most effective for consumers. In a study (Dansinger et. al. 2005) of several popular diet programs, Weight Watchers was found to have a higher percentage of people sticking with the program then either the Atkins or Ornish diets (65% vs. 53% and 50% respectively). The people who stuck with the program lost an average of 3.5kg (7.7 pounds) at the 2 month mark maintained a weight loss of 3kg (~6.5 pounds) at the one year mark. Another study (Ahern et. al. 2010) found that of people referred to Weight Watchers by a medical professional, 33% completed the 12 meeting recommendation and lost 5% or more of their body weight (10 pounds in a 200 pound person).
The Verdict
If we take a look at what Weight Watchers recommends with their point system, the equation naturally pushes people to high protein foods, fruits, and vegetables. This is very similar to the recommendations I give my clients with Flex Dieting but there are some important differences. The point system makes food intake much easier to track. Rather than keeping tabs on fluctuating calorie and protein counts, Weight Watcher participants are only asked to keep track of one number per day which makes for a very simple program. On top of that, Weight Watchers provides participants with the support of a community that shares their goals and struggles which is an invaluable tool in making major life changes.
For all the good things though, the weight loss over time is a little low for my liking. Looking at the data for weight lost on Weight Watchers, the program encourages moderate weight loss in the first 2-3 months and then encourages maintenance rather than further weight loss. This coupled with a low adherence rate makes me question the long term effectiveness of the program.
I’d say that Weight Watchers is a great starting place for losing weight. It does a great job of teaching nutritional awareness to people who want to learn. It provides a good foundation for people to build off of but once they hit the 2-3 month mark, Weight Watchers provides diminishing returns.
Going into the start of the new year, I’m doing a series on the different popular diets out there right now. My in house recommendation is and always will be Flex Dieting, but that doesn’t mean I’m opposed to some of the other options out there. Throughout this series I’ll be referencing research hoping to provide an accurate, unbiased overview.
The Fat Burner
Keto has been around for so long now I probably shouldn’t be calling it a fad. Originally popularized in the 1920’s as a cure for epilepsy (no joke), this diet made a comeback in the early 90’s and began to draw the attention of researchers. The key factor of Keto is restricting carb intake to less than 30g per day. By reducing available sugars, your body switches to burning fat for energy. This process is called ketosis (hence keto). There are a lot of claimed side effects from switching over to Keto, the largest include faster weight loss, lowered insulin levels, and higher energy levels while dieting.
The Research
Keto has been around for so long that there’s a ton of research out there. Many of the papers come to the same conclusion. Inthis study researchers studied 120 overweight participants and found that more people stuck with the low carb diet and they lost more weight than people on low fat diets (Yancy et. al. 2004). A similar paper compiling multiple studies found the same thing, people on Keto lost more weight than people on low carb diets (Bueno et. al. 2013). A larger studywith a longer duration (322 participants over 2 years) saw greater average fat loss in people on low carb diets than participants on low fat or Mediterranean based diets (Shai et. al. 2008).
Conclusions
From the research I’ve done, there seems to be overwhelming evidence that a low carb diet accelerates fat loss. It is important to note though, that people on the comparison diets in these studies saw significant weight loss as well. In the last study I reference, the average weight loss at 2 years for Keto participants was 5.5kg compared to 4.6kg for the Mediterranean diet and 3.3kg for the low fat diet participants.
The Verdict
Keto is great but it can be inconvenient for many people. The average American diet is very carb heavy and transitioning away from a grain/sugar/cereal based diet will take a significant lifestyle change. The results are worth it in my mind, but I can understand if it is too much change for some people. I’d recommend Keto for people who are very committed to losing weight quickly and are willing to make the sacrifices it will take.
Appreciate the insight? As a personal trainer, that’s what I’m here for; to make sure you’ve got the right information to reach your goals faster. Use the form below to sign up for one month of free online coaching and see the difference it makes!
Going into the start of the new year, I’m doing a series on the different popular diets out there right now. My in house recommendation is and always will be Flex Dieting, but that doesn’t mean I’m opposed to some of the other options out there. Throughout this series I’ll be referencing research hoping to provide an accurate, unbiased overview.
The Caveman Diet
The core of the Paleo diet is focusing on consuming foods that our ancestors (theoretically) ate. The thinking here is that humans are genetically predisposed to react better to certain foods and that the industrialization of the food industry has taken us away from the foods that are best for us. A Paleo diet focuses on the consumption of fruits, veggies, nuts, roots, and meats while avoiding food that must be processed such as dairy, grains, and legumes.
This diet began to gain popularity in 2002 with the book The Paleo Diet by Loren Cordain. In this book, Cordain recommends a daily breakdown of 55% of calories from meat/seafood, 15% from fruits, 15% from veggies, and 15% from nuts/seeds. In my experience though, most Paleo participants are more concerned with food choice than the caloric balance.
The Research
Thankfully, the rise of fad diets has been accompanied by a rise in scrutiny as researchers fact check the claims each camp makes. The article “Cutting through the Paleo hype: The evidence for the Palaeolithic diet” by Christopher E. Pritt acts a compilation of much of the current literature that exists on the Paleo diet. I will be using this piece as the source of my information.
While there hasn’t been much research on Plaeo (relative to other diets) the results of the studies we do have are positive. People placed on a Paleo diet lost more weight in the short term, lost inches in their midsection quicker, and felt more satisfied by the food they were eating. Some concerns do include low levels of calcium which may result in decreased bone mass and some people experience hormonal imbalance on a low carb diet.
Conclusions
Pritt believes that there isn’t enough research to form any solid conclusion yet. Many of the papers in his review had small sample sizes and focused on short term effects. He recommends that there need to be more large population, long term studies before official and medical recommendations can be made.
Personally, I believe the results of the Paleo studies sound very similar the to results of any high protein diet. 55% protein by calorie is much higher than my flex dieting recommendation (which typically falls around 40%). The body’s reaction to increased protein would largely explain many of the the listed results. The increased thermic effect (additional work it takes to digest protein) would explain why people on Paleo lost weight quicker. Reduced carbohydrate intake would explain the inches lost as the water stores associated with high carb diets faded. Additionally the hormonal response to a high protein diet would explain the increased satiety participants experienced.
The Verdict
Paleo works, but so do most diets if you pay attention and stick to them. There isn’t much research on the long term effects of Paleo though. From what I’ve read, I believe many of the benefits come from its high protien focus which can be achieved with other diets. I’d recommend giving this a try if the food selection is easy for you to stick to or the mentality of a primal diet is appealing.
My clients are well aware that I’ve been cutting (fitness jargon for restricting calories or dieting) for a month now. I’ll let you ask them how grumpy I’ve been, but I think it’s gone pretty well. So without further ado, here are my thoughts on the road so far.
Why I Decided to Diet
The reason I’ve been doing this is not for the washboard abs or to be more healthy, I decided to do this in order to understand exactly what I was asking my clients to do. I felt it was unfair for me advise my clients to do things I was not willing to do myself and to try to relate to them when I hadn’t put myself in their shoes for at least some time. With that goal, here’s how I approached things.
What I Did
At the start of my diet, I calculated my resting metabolism to be somewhere around 2,400 calories per day. That meant (according to the tool I used) I could eat 2,400 calories per day in order to maintain the weight I was at (180lbs). That number comes from a calculator which takes into account my height, weight, and level of activity. From this number I calculated a 10% reduction which is commonly agreed upon as a healthy place to cut at. That 10% gave me a daily calorie intake of 2160 which I rounded down to a daily target 2100 (~12.5% reduction). Beyond this target caloric intake, I didn’t restrict myself in any other way. I did naturally fall into a pattern of intermittent fasting where I would eat most of my calories in a six hour window between 3pm and 9pm, but that was a convenience thing more than an intentional one. I’ll look at fad diets in the future, but for my first nutrition experiment I wanted to keep things as simple as possible.
How I Did It
For the first three weeks of my experiment, I didn’t change my routine much outside of reducing calories. I kept working out three days each week doing primarily a weight lifting split. My food consisted mainly of a 550cal staple breakfast of 2 strips of bacon and 4 eggs (pictured above with banana bread 250cal extra), a 350cal snack at work (usually a sandwich with 4oz meat), and a simple dinner that changed daily ~800cal with a beer for the last 200cal. Now the detail oriented readers out there will notice this adds up to 1900 and not 2100. I did this intentionally in order to avoid underestimates (mostly at dinner or at restaurants) throwing off my plan. In most cases I tried to overestimate, but this acted as an extra safeguard. For the last week, I introduced a >30min cardio routine in place of my lifting routine do see if this would make any remarkable changes over a one week period.
The End Result
As of the end of the four week period, I reached a low point of 175lbs. There was a little bit of variation in this number but there was definitely an overall downward trend. Once I switched from lifting to cardio, I actually gained 2lbs on the scale. This is a good reminder that the scale isn’t a great tool for tracking fitness or health. The scale is only able to tell you how much you currently weigh, it isn’t able to track where that weight comes from though. A term that gets tossed around a lot is water weight which is essentially the amount of water your body retains. When you are more active, your muscles retain more water and make that scale number go up with no actual change in body composition. This is most likely why I gained the two pounds when I included the cardio. Even though I was still slowly decreasing fat levels (and muscle to some extent) by being at a caloric deficit, I was retaining more water than I was burning fat.
What I Learned
One of the biggest things I learned from this experiment was that preparationis essential. If I was planning on going out with friends one night, I needed to eat less through the day so I could join them. If I was cooking at home, I needed to make sure I had food on hand that wasn’t Ramen and peanut butter. If I was going to be at work for 12 hours, I needed to stop by Kroger to get something that would keep my blood sugar up.